Last Updated on November 9, 2010
WASHINGTON – Plaintiffs in the long-running lawsuit over the Individual Indian Money trust have rejected proposals from the presidential administration to consolidate the fractionated IIM lands, turn management functions and land title over to individuals and tribes while curtailing federal liabilities, and settle outstanding claims in return for monetary payments.
”We are back at square one,” contends Elouise Cobell, of the case that bears her name, adding that the administration’s proposals, coming late in the legislative session, have made a hash of settlement efforts by the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. ”We have said from the beginning that we want a settlement, but have emphasized that it must be fair. … It is not fair to pay claims pennies on the dollar. So we will continue our litigation efforts since the government’s proposal has effectively killed any possibility of a sound resolution.”
Following Cobell’s statements in an Oct. 31 release, the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians issued one that claimed wholesale rejection of the measures by tribes in the Northwest, the Plains and the Southeast.
The ATNI release quoted Fawn Sharp, chairman of the Quinault Nation, as being ”appalled” at last-minute proposals that would ”alter the nature of federal – Indian relationships.”
In addition, Chairman Harold Frazier of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe is quoted as equating the proposals with ”termination” at an Oct. 25 SCIA meeting in Rapid City, S.D.
see http://indiantrust.com for more info
Across the world right now, Indigenous peoples are facing a renewed assault on their lands, rights, and ways of life.
From extractive industries pushing deeper into ancestral territories, to governments rolling back hard-won protections,
the threat is global—and it is growing.
What makes this moment especially dangerous is how little attention it receives.
Stories like this are disappearing in real time. Mainstream media
barely covers it and the coverage is fragmented. The public is left without the context
needed to understand what is truly at stake.
That is exactly why IC Magazine exists..
For more than 20 years, IC has reported on Indigenous struggles worldwide — consistently, independently, and without compromise.
We don’t follow news cycles; we trace patterns. We don’t sensationalize; we provide context.
And when the world looks away, we stay focused.
But this work is increasingly difficult to sustain.
We refuse to lock our reporting behind a paywall. We don’t sell access through subscriptions.
And we don’t answer to advertisers. IC Magazine survives solely because readers like you choose to
support independent Indigenous journalism.
Please donate today if you can. Every contribution helps us to continue this crucial work.
Thank you,
John Ahni Schertow
Founder and Editor in Chief
