Ipperwash inquiry hears final arguments
Canada in focus ⬿

Ipperwash inquiry hears final arguments

info
August 21, 2006
 

Last Updated on June 18, 2014

The former Mike Harris government bears indirect responsibility for the police shooting death of aboriginal protester Dudley George in 1995, the Ipperwash inquiry heard during closing arguments on Monday morning.

A lawyer representing George’s family, Murray Klippenstein, said during the first day of closing arguments at the inquiry that there are two parallel tracks to understanding what happened the day George was killed.

Stay Informed!
Enter your email to receive a weekly round-up of our best posts.
icon

George was shot by an Ontario Provincial Police officer on Sept. 6, 1995, during a standoff at Ipperwash Provincial Park in southwestern Ontario.

Klippenstein wondered why the OPP called in the crowd-management unit wearing riot gear the day George was shot.

This was not part of a plan and was not approved by commanders, he argued, but showed a commitment and a mindset predisposed to the use of force.

Harris made his opinion clear

The second question, he said, was where that mindset came from.

The family’s lawyer argued it stemmed from Queen’s Park, where Ontario’s premier at the time, Mike Harris, made his opinion clear that he wanted the aboriginal protesters out of the park.

Become a Patron!
This isn’t charity — it’s solidarity. Supporting IC on Patreon fuels frontline truth-telling so Indigenous resistance can’t be ignored, twisted, or stolen.
icon

No direct orders came from Harris, but his opinion was transmitted to police on a number of occasions, Klippenstein argued.

He said OPP officers reacted to what they were told the premier wanted.

Klippenstein cited a number of conversations, including one that has become infamous during the two-year judicial inquiry.

Former attorney general Charles Harnick testified in November 2005 that Harris had said “I want the fucking Indians out of the park” during a meeting just hours before the fatal shooting.

No evidence of political interference

Harris’s lawyer, Peter Downard, will give his final submission Tuesday, but told CBC News before final submissions began Monday that he plans to argue critics are wrong about what could be the most important issue at the Ipperwash inquiry.

Critics accused Harris of directing police to remove the occupiers of the provincial park. Downard says it is clear the former premier did not do that.

While Downard acknowledges Harris wanted a quick end to the occupation, he says the inquiry found no evidence of political interference.

“There was a clear attack on premier Harris, an attack on his character, a suggestion that he had directed police to attack First Nations people, and he didn’t do that. He didn’t do that,” said Downard.

Closing arguments expected to finish Thursday

Final submissions in the judicial inquiry are being heard by Justice Sidney Linden, who is presiding over the inquiry in the town of Forest, Ont.

The inquiry is examining what role, if any, the provincial government played in the events leading to George’s death, and how to prevent similar incidents in the future.

In late June, the inquiry concluded two years of often controversial testimony from some 140 witnesses.

The closing remarks, expected to wrap up Thursday, will mark the official end of the inquiry.

Linden is expected to submit a final report to the provincial government before the end of the year.

(source)

Dear reader,

Across the world right now, Indigenous peoples are facing a renewed assault on their lands, rights, and ways of life. From extractive industries pushing deeper into ancestral territories, to governments rolling back hard-won protections, the threat is global—and it is growing.

What makes this moment especially dangerous is how little attention it receives.

Stories like this are disappearing in real time. Mainstream media barely covers it and the coverage is fragmented. The public is left without the context needed to understand what is truly at stake.

That is exactly why IC Magazine exists..

For more than 20 years, IC has reported on Indigenous struggles worldwide — consistently, independently, and without compromise. We don’t follow news cycles; we trace patterns. We don’t sensationalize; we provide context. And when the world looks away, we stay focused.

But this work is increasingly difficult to sustain.

We refuse to lock our reporting behind a paywall. We don’t sell access through subscriptions. And we don’t answer to advertisers. IC Magazine survives solely because readers like you choose to support independent Indigenous journalism.

Please donate today if you can. Every contribution helps us to continue this crucial work.

Thank you,

John Ahni Schertow
Founder and Editor in Chief

 
#Ipperwash #Ontario #testimony #News #Indigenous Struggles in Canada ↝ The Ojibway Nation: Protectors of Language, Land, and Waterways

Related Posts

Keep us independent for $10/m and get our book, "Everyday Acts of Resurgence", free!