Blackfoot Confederacy chiefs back court-ordered pause on Alberta separation petition
Canada in focus ⬿

Blackfoot Confederacy chiefs back court-ordered pause on Alberta separation petition

Photo: Qyd on Wikimedia (CC)
info
April 16, 2026
 

Last Updated on April 16, 2026

Chiefs of the Blackfoot Confederacy are backing a court-ordered pause on a citizen-led petition seeking a referendum on Alberta separation, saying the move is needed to protect Treaty rights and allow for proper legal review.

In a recent statement, the Chiefs said they “acknowledge the decision of the Court of King’s Bench granting a stay on the certification of a citizen led petition,” describing it as “a necessary step in ensuring that the constitutional and Treaty-based relationship governing these lands is upheld.”

Stay Informed!
Enter your email to receive a weekly round-up of our best posts.
icon

The ruling, issued April 10, halts the certification of petition results and prevents further progress toward a referendum until the court resolves legal challenges brought by First Nations, including the Blackfoot Confederacy and Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation.

According to the statement, the court found that concerns raised by First Nations warrant serious consideration, including whether the Crown fulfilled its duty to consult and whether the process infringes on constitutionally protected Treaty rights.

“The Court also recognized that allowing the process to proceed without review presents the risk of ongoing and irreparable harm to Treaty relationships,” the Chiefs said.

The Blackfoot Confederacy emphasized that any discussion of Alberta’s political future must include First Nations as full participants, rejecting efforts to separate provincial political debates from Treaty obligations.

“The Chiefs of the Blackfoot Confederacy reject any approach that advances this process without the full and meaningful involvement of First Nations,” the statement said. “Efforts to equate provincial political disputes with the inherent and constitutionally protected rights of First Nations misrepresent the legal foundation of this country.”

The statement also underscored that Treaty relationships predate the province itself, asserting that “those advancing Alberta separation continue to live, work, and build their lives here because of Treaty… and that foundation cannot be ignored or displaced.”

Become a Patron!
This isn’t charity — it’s solidarity. Supporting IC on Patreon fuels frontline truth-telling so Indigenous resistance can’t be ignored, twisted, or stolen.
icon

The Confederacy expressed solidarity with Treaty 8 First Nations involved in the legal challenge, including Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation and Mikisew Cree First Nation.

“This decision affirms that the future of these lands cannot move forward without the First Nations whose rights and responsibilities are anchored in Treaty,” the Chiefs said, adding that First Nations “must be directly involved in any decisions that affect their lands and future.”

The Chiefs concluded by reaffirming that Treaty 7 remains a binding and living agreement.

“Blackfoot Treaty 7 remains a living agreement that continues to guide how this territory is shared and governed,” the statement said. “The Chiefs of the Blackfoot Confederacy will ensure that any path forward is grounded in that reality.”

The court’s final decision on the legal challenges is pending.

Dear reader,

Across the world right now, Indigenous peoples are facing a renewed assault on their lands, rights, and ways of life. From extractive industries pushing deeper into ancestral territories, to governments rolling back hard-won protections, the threat is global—and it is growing.

What makes this moment especially dangerous is how little attention it receives.

Stories like this are disappearing in real time. Mainstream media barely covers it and the coverage is fragmented. The public is left without the context needed to understand what is truly at stake.

That is exactly why IC Magazine exists..

For more than 20 years, IC has reported on Indigenous struggles worldwide — consistently, independently, and without compromise. We don’t follow news cycles; we trace patterns. We don’t sensationalize; we provide context. And when the world looks away, we stay focused.

But this work is increasingly difficult to sustain.

We refuse to lock our reporting behind a paywall. We don’t sell access through subscriptions. And we don’t answer to advertisers. IC Magazine survives solely because readers like you choose to support independent Indigenous journalism.

Please donate today if you can. Every contribution helps us to continue this crucial work.

Thank you,

John Ahni Schertow
Founder and Editor in Chief

 
#Alberta Separatism Debate #News #Indigenous Struggles in Canada

Related Posts

Keep us independent for $10/m and get our book, "Everyday Acts of Resurgence", free!