Last Updated on August 30, 2018
Fortescue Metals Group (FMG), a massive iron ore mining company based in Australia, is trying to get out of a state order forcing the company to protect any burial sites they encounter on Yindjibarndi country in Western Australia’s Pilbara region.
In June of this year, WA’s Indigenous Affairs Minister, Peter Collier, sent a four-page letter to FMG outlining nine special conditions for the company, including a requirement to stop work on their massive $8.5 billion Solomon Hub project if they encountered any human remains.
The letter warned that any failure to comply with the conditions could constitute an unlawful breach of the 1972 Aboriginal Heritage Act.
The minister’s letter also identified eight specific heritage sites that FMG should protect; however, that only represents a small fraction of the actual number of sites in Yindjibarndi country. “There are 250 or more in this country, some very important places for our religious ceremonies,” Michael Woodley, chief executive of the Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation (YAC), told the Age.
Since receiving the Minister’s letter , FMG has uncovered three sets of skeletal remains, two of which were found in caves within the company’s “Firetail Priority Mining and Infrastructure” area.
FMG insists that the remains haven’t been moved and that they are protected by an exclusion zone, but now that could change. The company has approached the State government’s Administrative Appeals Tribunal to quash several of the Minister’s conditions.
Those conditions include:
1) “Avoid all sites that contain Aboriginal human remains”;
2) “Prior to conducting the Purpose consult with representatives of the Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation and the Wirlu-Murra Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation, to the satisfaction of the Registrar, to clarify the status of heritage places on the Land and identify all heritage values associated with places on the Land”; and
3) “Prior to conducting the Purpose provide the Registrar with information on the location and archaeological and ethnographic assessments of all rockshelters and caves located on the Land which will include copies of all archaeological and anthropological reports over the Land”.
An apparently-sympathetic tribunal wasted no time responding to FMG’s request for the right to disturb the Yindjibarndi’s heritage sites. They formally asked the minister to reconsider his position. As of Oct 15, the tribunal is still waiting for the minister’s decision.
Saying that the company wants to disturb a few heritage sites here and there, is putting it mildly–especially if the Yindjibarndi have anything to say about it. Woodley told the Age that any disturbance, desecration or destruction of their ancestral remains could unleash dangerous forces into the world, and seriously harm those responsible. “We Yindjibarndis are in danger too, unless we protect our sacred sites,” he said. “If we fail, our Skygod will make us sick and kill us we believe.”
No doubt FMG’s having a good laugh over that one.
Media Contact:
Michael Woodley
CEO Yindjibarndi Aboriginal Corporation
0419 097 130
mwoodley at juluwarlu.com.au
media at juluwarlu.com.au
For background & research materials please visit: www.yindjibarndi.org.au and http://www.facebook.com/pages/Yindjibarndi-Aboriginal-Corporation/172898829429496
Also see
Article: Yindjibarndi face off against Australia’s richest man
Statement: CLARIFICATION: FMG mining and construction cannot legally begin on Yindjibarndi country
Report: Censored: FMG’s Great Native Title Swindle
Report: FMG Solomon Mining Lease Fact sheet
Video: A Song For Country FMG Want To Destroy
Map: Fortescue Mining’s tenements on Yindjibarndi country
Statement: Yindjibarndi reject FMG’s return to ‘dark ages of paternalism’
Across the world right now, Indigenous peoples are facing a renewed assault on their lands, rights, and ways of life.
From extractive industries pushing deeper into ancestral territories, to governments rolling back hard-won protections,
the threat is global—and it is growing.
What makes this moment especially dangerous is how little attention it receives.
Stories like this are disappearing in real time. Mainstream media
barely covers it and the coverage is fragmented. The public is left without the context
needed to understand what is truly at stake.
That is exactly why IC Magazine exists..
For more than 20 years, IC has reported on Indigenous struggles worldwide — consistently, independently, and without compromise.
We don’t follow news cycles; we trace patterns. We don’t sensationalize; we provide context.
And when the world looks away, we stay focused.
But this work is increasingly difficult to sustain.
We refuse to lock our reporting behind a paywall. We don’t sell access through subscriptions.
And we don’t answer to advertisers. IC Magazine survives solely because readers like you choose to
support independent Indigenous journalism.
Please donate today if you can. Every contribution helps us to continue this crucial work.
Thank you,
John Ahni Schertow
Founder and Editor in Chief
