Last Updated on February 20, 2026
After years of protests and blockades, a group of Atikamekw elders and chiefs have filed a lawsuit seeking to cancel forestry permits across a vast stretch of northern Quebec.
The lawsuit, filed Thursday in Quebec’s Superior Court, challenges the province’s authority to issue forestry permits within Nehirowisiw Aski, the ancestral territory of the Atikamekw, without properly consulting them.
Lawyers for the group describe the case as unprecedented, saying it is the first time that land defenders — a traditional role not formally recognized in Canadian law — have directly asserted Aboriginal title through the courts.
The region at the centre of the dispute lies roughly five hours north of Montreal. It has been the scene of repeated blockades with Indigenous-led efforts to stop clear-cut logging and protest Quebec’s overhaul of its forestry regime.
Those demonstrations failed to produce negotiations with the province, prompting leaders to pursue legal action instead.
“We’ve never been against the industry,” Dave Petiquay, a land defender for Nehirowisiw Aski, told The Globe and Mail. “We’re opposed to the way they awarded permits [and do] their cuts.”
Mr. Petiquay explained that industrial-scale harvesting has eroded their ability to harvest medicinal plants, gather tree bark for traditional canoe-making, and collect foods such as blueberries.
Community leaders also accuse the provincial government of conducting consultations only after decisions have already been made, undermining the government’s duty to consult in good faith.
“If they consult, they will already have made the decision – a forestry permit is already awarded to a company before coming to the territory and consulting the elders,” Lisanne Petiquay, president of the Association of Land Defenders, told The Globe and Mail.
The plaintiffs say their case is intended not only to protect their own territory, but to establish a legal pathway for other Indigenous nations whose lands are affected by resource extraction.
Rather than relying on negotiations that often recognize only individual communities, they argue a court ruling could create jurisprudence that affirms broader Indigenous land rights.
The lawsuit comes at a politically sensitive moment in Canada with the recent Cowichan court decision continuing to raise tensions between Indigenous land claims, government authority and private economic interests.
Numerous other disputes are also unfolding across the country, including several oil and gas infrastructure projects in British Columbia, development plans in the mineral-rich Ring of Fire region and a variety of land rights conflicts involving Grassy Narrows First Nation.
Across the world right now, Indigenous peoples are facing a renewed assault on their lands, rights, and ways of life.
From extractive industries pushing deeper into ancestral territories, to governments rolling back hard-won protections,
the threat is global—and it is growing.
What makes this moment especially dangerous is how little attention it receives.
Stories like this are disappearing in real time. Mainstream media
barely covers it and the coverage is fragmented. The public is left without the context
needed to understand what is truly at stake.
That is exactly why IC Magazine exists..
For more than 20 years, IC has reported on Indigenous struggles worldwide — consistently, independently, and without compromise.
We don’t follow news cycles; we trace patterns. We don’t sensationalize; we provide context.
And when the world looks away, we stay focused.
But this work is increasingly difficult to sustain.
We refuse to lock our reporting behind a paywall. We don’t sell access through subscriptions.
And we don’t answer to advertisers. IC Magazine survives solely because readers like you choose to
support independent Indigenous journalism.
Please donate today if you can. Every contribution helps us to continue this crucial work.
Thank you,
John Ahni Schertow
Founder and Editor in Chief
